Another survivor. Another institution. Another investigation. 

At Cornell University, 57 individuals were reportedly involved in a fraternity group chat connected to allegations of sexual violence. While those implicated were able to continue their education, Jane Doe, the survivor who came forward, faced significant barriers to completing hers. 

Young women aged 18–24 are among those at greatest risk of sexual violence, and research has identified heightened risks associated with attending post-secondary institutions. For many survivors, the consequences of sexual violence extend far beyond the initial harm, affecting their education, housing, financial security, mental health, and ability to participate fully in campus life. 

It was The Cornell Daily Sun, the student newspaper, rather than Cornell University itself, that publicly identified individuals named in the lawsuit. This reporting brought greater public attention to the allegations and raised important questions about institutional transparency and accountability. We applaud the Cornell Daily Sun and their community of student journalists for their work – campus activism has always been at the centre of meaningful social change. At the same time, survivors should not have to rely on student journalists, public outrage, or sustained external pressure for institutions to take their experiences seriously. They deserve systems that are accountable to them in the first place. 

We are watching the Cornell case unfold with a familiar dread. We saw it as Hockey Canada and Sloka cases unfolded.  

Advocates carry these stories with us. Researchers study how to prevent violence, governments commission reports, universities write policies, police receive training, and yet, we still see the same apparatus at work. These are different cases, in different countries, governed by different laws. We will not collapse them into one story. 

But we will not pretend we cannot recognize what is familiar. 

  • The relentless search for inconsistency in survivors' recollection of their traumatic experience. 
  • The expectation that traumatic memories should be complete and unchanging.  
  • The dissection of a person's most painful memories used as evidence 
  • Investigative failures, police incompetence, and institutional complicity  
  • And survivors who are met with suspicion, humiliation, and disbelief instead of the support and care they deserve.  

To survivors who are watching and listening: we believe you. What happened to you matters. And we refuse to accept a system that was never built to find justice for you.  

We refuse to accept institutions telling survivors to report while treating what happens afterwards as an unfortunate flaw in an otherwise functioning system. At some point, repetition stops being failure, and becomes a choice. Survivors continue to bear the consequences of choices governments, police, courts and institutions insist on making over and over again, until the next high-profile headline.  A university is not on trial here. Neither is one prosecutor, one sports team, one fraternity, one police service, or one judge.  

Justice is on trial, and survivors have submitted enough evidence. 

The attention brought to this case also demonstrates the importance of persistence, collective advocacy, independent journalism, and sustained public pressure. Institutions can be compelled to respond when survivors and communities refuse to allow these issues to be ignored. However, meaningful accountability should not depend on survivors repeatedly sharing their trauma or communities mobilizing public outrage before action is taken. 

Survivors deserve to pursue their education free from sexual violence, retaliation, and institutional barriers. Universities and colleges must be held accountable for creating environments where survivors are believed, supported, and able to access education without being forced to choose between their safety and their futures. 

Access to education should never come at the expense of safety, and accountability should never depend on how loudly survivors are forced to fight for it. 

—-  

 

We believe survivors 

We commend Jane Doe for finding the courage to continue to speak about her experience. We commend all survivors of sexual violence who choose to tell their stories, whether it be in a court of law, or to a friend, family member or other support people. Finally, we recognize, commend and support the decisions of those who never share or report their experiences. —in In Canada, this is by far the vast majority and the more these high profile cases roll out, the more we are reminded of the majority who will never report, never speak out and never have justice. Nevertheless, we choose to believe survivors! 

 

If you are a survivor of sexual violence: 

If something has happened to you, please know that there are people who believe and support you. 

  • You can talk to a friend, family member or other person you trust 
  • If something has happened to you and you are considering reporting, we can help you think through your options. If you are not considering reporting, that's okay too 
  • Learn more about sexual assault centres in Ontario here 

If you are a friend, family member or mentor, there are things you can do too: 

  • You can be an ally to sexual violence survivors 
  • You can listen to the person's story without judgement 
  • You can listen to the person's story without expectations that they formally report 

 

Disclaimer

Any information provided on this website (and documents that can be downloaded from the site) is to be considered information only. It is not a substitute for support or legal advice.

Information posted here by Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres is accurate and current to the best of our knowledge as of the date it is posted. However, website users should be aware that community services, programs, campaigns and government policies connected to sexual violence and other forms of gender-based violence can change frequently, sometimes without notice.

OCRCC is not a crisis service. Anyone needing support or help right away is encouraged to contact their local sexual assault support service or a provincial crisis line.

Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres does not verify the accuracy or currency of any other information or opinion posted on or linked from this website.

Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres takes no responsibility for any use made of the information appearing here by website users or others with whom they may share the information found here.

Privacy Policy

Security of your personal information is very important to our relationships with visitors to our website. We will not rent or sell any information gathered nor will your personal information be shared with any third parties for any reason.

Email

Email is not a secure medium, and appropriate precautions should be taken when contacting us to send personal or confidential information.

Accuracy of information

In no event or circumstance is Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres, its directors, employees or volunteers liable for losses or damages of whatever nature arising in any manner from the use of the Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres website or from errors, omissions, inaccuracies or misleading information contained on this website. Please read our disclaimer for more information.

Third parties

While we try to select third-party services that are trustworthy and reliable, Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres cannot be responsible for third-party use usage of data related to this website. This includes internet service providers who may provide user information to governing authorities without notification to us or to you.

Our website contains links to third-party websites. These links are provided solely as a convenience to you and not as an endorsement by Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres of the contents of such third-party websites.

Organizations with websites linked to this site are solely responsible for the operation (including the right to display such information) and information found on their respective websites. The linking to or from this site does not imply on the part of Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres any endorsement or guarantee of any of the organizations or the information found on their respective websites.

While Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres encourages links to its website, it does not wish to be linked to or from any third-party website which contains, posts or transmits any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind.

You agree to remove any link you may have to our website at the request of Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres.

Questions, comments and permissions

If you have any questions or comments regarding Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres terms and conditions, or if you are seeking permission to reproduce part of this website or any of our resources, you may contact us by e-mail at ocrcccoordinator@hotmail.com.

Terms of Use

Use of material on this website

This website www.sexualassaultsupport.ca is owned and operated by Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres (OCRCC). Please read these terms and conditions carefully before using our website. By using it, you automatically agree to all of the terms and conditions, which may be revised from time to time. If you continue to use our site after we post changes to the terms and conditions, it will mean that you accept those changes.

Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres maintains this website for your information, education and communication. Please feel free to browse our site. The material on this site is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreement. The material on our site, including but not limited to, artwork, photos, graphics, text and Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres logo, are the sole property of Ontario Coalition of Rape Crisis Centres unless otherwise stated.

Reproduction of photographs and images and all other material identified as being the property of a third party is prohibited.